ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025
Fixel based analysis on diffusion MRI of COVID-19 survivors.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The underlying mechanisms of long-term sequelae of the COVID-19 infection, including fatigue, memory issues, and attention deficit, remain to be understood. Therefore, we investigated the Diffusion MRI scans of 73 COVID-Recovered Patients (CRPs) and 46 Healthy Controls (HCs) using Fixel-based analysis to study the sub-voxel microstructural properties of nervous tissue. We compared the Fiber Density (FD), log scaled Fiber Cross-section (log-FC), and a combined fiber density and cross-section measure (FDC) across the cohorts. Our study reveals significant alterations (pFWE <0.01) in the uncinate fasciculus (FD, log-FC, FDC; CRP > HC), perigenual corpus callosum (FD; CRP > HC), fornix (log-FC, FDC; CRP > HC), right arcuate fasciculus (FD; CRP < HC), as well as bilateral clusters in the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (FD; CRP < HC), and the corticospinal tract (FD; CRP < HC). We suggest that these changes may be related to microscopic changes in axonal volume. Notably, the tracts identified in this study highlight the involvement of the limbic system and the visuospatial attention network in the disorder. We expect our findings to improve our understanding of the neurological underpinnings of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.