Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567447›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025

Innovative biomarker exploration in ASD: Combining Graph Neural Networks and permutation testing on fMRI data.

Donglin Wang, Wandi Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donglin WangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, 37132, TN, USA.
Wandi DingDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Computational and Data Science Program, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 E Main St, Murfreesboro, 37132, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employed Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), specifically an unsupervised GNN, to extract node embeddings from brain regions in both Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and control groups. The objective was to identify potential biomarkers by analyzing node embeddings extracted from a graph model based on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data. Permutation tests were conducted to identify regions with significant differences in their embeddings between the two groups. Our results revealed several regions exhibiting significant differences, including the cerebellum, temporal lobe, and occipital lobe. These findings align with previous studies on ASD. Moreover, novel regions such as Vermis_3, Vermis_4_5, Fusiform areas, Parietal, and Cuneus were identified, emphasizing the need for further investigation. This study underscores the potential of GNNs in analyzing brain networks for ASD biomarker discovery. The identified regions warrant additional validation and exploration to understand their association with specific domains of ASD symptoms. Our approach presents a promising avenue to advance the diagnosis of ASD and to improve our understanding of its underlying neural basis.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)BiomarkerGraph Neural Networks (GNNs)Permutation test

Identifiers

PMID40567447
PMCPMC12172723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.