ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025
Automated landmark-based symmetric and standard alignment of skull base structures on CT.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Subject Registration-Based Augmentation: Alleviating Anatomical Misalignment in Trauma CT for Robust Hemorrhage Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Symmetry and standard alignment are crucial in both clinical interpretation and research on head CT studies. Registration to a standard template is the traditional method for alignment, yet registration does not guarantee precise alignment of any given structure. This study introduces a method for aligning skull base structures while still achieving a standard anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC)-like orientation on head CT studies using landmarks, specifically the cochleas and nasal bridge. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using head CTs from various General Electric scanners. Landmarks were manually annotated, and a 3D U-Net was trained for landmark identification. Landmark-based alignment was then performed on a test dataset and assessed in two different ways: whole head and skull base alignment. Whole head alignment was assessed quantitatively by expert review. Skull base alignment was then assessed at the cochleas, comparing their alignment between this landmark-based technique and registration to a template. Results: This landmark-based technique significantly improved whole head and skull base alignment of head CT studies. Whole head alignment reduced average deviations of 5, 11, and 4° in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes to 1, 5, and 2° respectively. Meanwhile, skull base alignment assessed via the cochlea was also improved relative to traditional registration. For the landmark technique, the cochleas were deviated from perfect by a mean of 0.552 and 0.511 mm along the y and z axes compared to 2.110 and 2.506 mm with registration. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a simple landmark-based technique for aligning the cochleas on head CT studies while approximating whole head AC-PC orientation, which has applications in both clinical and research settings, particularly for studies focused on the skull base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.