Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567429›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Moving the Needle: Program Directors' Views on the Recruitment of Diverse Trainees to Plastic Surgery Residency.

Natalie B Baxter, Timothy C Guetterman, Noelle Thompson, Mary L Byrnes, Gurjit Sandhu, Rachel C Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie B BaxterFrom the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Timothy C GuettermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Noelle ThompsonUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH.
Mary L ByrnesCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Gurjit SandhuDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rachel C HooperCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The plastic surgery workforce lacks racial and ethnic diversity. Traditionally, United States Medical Licensing Examination scores have been used as the initial screening tool for most residency programs; however, this can lead to interview selection bias against underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to diversifying the specialty from the perspectives of program directors (PDs) may reveal strategies for improvement. Methods: In this mixed methods study, we invited integrated plastic surgery PDs to participate in an online survey and one-on-one semistructured interviews to understand their perspectives on the application process, interview day, and strategies to improve recruitment and retention of URiM trainees. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey data. Interviews were deidentified, transcribed, and analyzed inductively to generate themes based on patterns observed across narratives. Results: Of 108 PDs and assistant PDs, 29 (26.9%) responded to the survey and 8 participated in semistructured interviews. We identified 3 broad themes: (1) resident diversity is important for patient care and education, (2) lack of exposure and longitudinal mentorship are barriers to matriculation, and (3) program culture change can shift trends in the recruitment of URiM trainees. Conclusions: PDs value the racial and ethnic diversity of trainees and are in favor of efforts to increase representation in the field. Improving mentorship and reducing bias in the application process are necessary strategies to increase representation in plastic surgery.

Identifiers

PMID40567429
PMCPMC12190121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.