ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2023
Introducing the English EmpaToM task: A tool to assess empathy, compassion, and theory of mind in fMRI studies.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the neural dynamics of affective and cognitive empathy: Insights from a within-subjects experimental design and mass univariate analysis.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dark Personality, Empathy, and Prosocial Behavior in Convicted Offenders.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- No evidence for disruption of empathy and mentalizing by face coverage in multimodal settings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Though empathy, compassion, and Theory of Mind (ToM) are related, they have been distinguished conceptually and empirically across behavioural and neuroimaging experiments. The EmpaToM task was the first realistic paradigm developed for use in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), which can reliably detect and distinguish three different types of neural pathways crucial for understanding others with a single well-controlled task. Though the paradigm holds the potential for use in research settings as well as clinical practice, it has thus far only been validated in German speaking populations, using stimuli in German language, restricting its usability across countries. We present an English-language translation of the original paradigm here. Method: Thirty-two English speaking adults underwent fMRI scanning, during which we collected neural and behavioural data as in the original validation of the EmpaToM task. Results: Apart from minor differences, these results replicated the main behavioural and neural findings observed during the validation of the German paradigm. Participants reported increased negative affect and activity in brain regions previously associated with empathy when observing video clips with negative vs neutral valence. They further reported increased compassion. The pattern of neural activity differentiating empathy from compassion was largely consistent with previous research. Increased activity in regions previously associated with ToM were observed in response to stimuli with ToM vs factual reasoning content. Conclusion: We therefore conclude that the English version of the EmpaToM task can be used to reliably assess empathy, compassion, and ToM on a behavioural as well as neuronal level across English speaking countries and institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.