ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Machine learning algorithms to predict epidural-related maternal fever: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a multivariable logistic regression model for predicting epidural-related maternal fever during labor analgesia: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The epidural-related maternal fever (ERMF) induced by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) remains unpredictable. Our objective is to develop ERMF prediction models using real-world data, aiming to identify pertinent contributing factors and support obstetricians in making personalized clinical decisions. Methods: Women who used patient-controlled epidural analgesia between October 2021 and March 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province were retrospectively documented. The primary outcome was the occurrence of maternal fever associated with epidural use. We developed six machine learning (ML) models and assessed the area under curve (AUC) for characteristics of subjects' performance, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses. Results: A total of 1,492 women were enrolled, with 24.3% experiencing ERMF (362 cases). The AUC ratios between the logistic regression (LR) model and the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) models showed statistical significance (p < 0.05), while the differences between the other models were not statistically significant. In comparison to the SVM model, the LR model exhibited better calibration (Brier score: 0.193; calibration slope: 0.715; calibration intercept: 0.062). Consequently, the LR model was selected as the prediction model. Furthermore, the LR-based nomogram identified eight significant predictors of ERMF, including neutrophil percentage, first stage of labor, amniotic fluid contamination during membrane rupture, artificial rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, post-analgesic antimicrobials, pre-analgesic oxytocin, post-analgesic oxytocin, and dinoprostone suppositories. Conclusion: Optimally applying logistic regression models can enable rapid and straightforward identification of ERMF risk and the implementation of rational therapeutic measures, in contrast to machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.