ReviewIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Sepsis Prediction: A Scoping Review.
Review in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbidities and Inflammation: How Chronic Diseases Prime the Host Response in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Explainable Retrospective Sepsis Classification Based on Elixhauser Comorbidity Groups Using Machine and Deep Learning on MIMIC-IV.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between innate immune signaling pathways and integrated TLR, NLRP3 inflammasome, cGAS-STING, and NF-κB networks in sepsis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- From Narrative to Navigation-A Translational Roadmap for AI-enabled Early Sepsis Prediction: Comment on Shanmugam et al.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Bloodstream Infections: Shaping the Future of Rapid Diagnostics and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Infectious Diseases in Older Adults: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- DiabCompSepsAI: Integrated AI Model for Early Detection and Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Diabetic Patients-Using a Random Forest Classifier.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Sepsis, a dangerous condition where infection triggers an abnormal host response, requires quick detection to save lives. While traditional detection methods often fall short, artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offer new hope. This scoping review inspects the ML and DL models that are published in the period from 2022 to 2025 for sepsis prediction using electronic health records (EHRs). It aims to provide a comprehensive update for clinicians on the proposed sepsis prediction models, features used, data processing methods, model performance and clinical integration. Methods: Our March 11, 2025, PubMed search identified thirteen relevant studies that developed ML or DL models for predicting adult sepsis. Results: Most researchers used supervised ML, with some exploring DL and hybrid approaches. The models relied on standard clinical data like vital signs and laboratory results, similar to traditional scoring methods. Some models utilized demographic information and electrocardiographic (ECG) readings as features to predict sepsis. Performance metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, specificity, and sensitivity showed that these ML and DL models often surpassed the ability of both human clinicians and traditional scoring systems in predicting sepsis. Notable innovations included federated learning and model integration with EHR systems and physiological sensors. Conclusion: While AI shows promise for early sepsis detection, successful clinical adoption will require real-world testing and clear model interpretability. Future work should focus on standardizing these tools for practical medical use. How to cite this article: Shanmugam H, Airen L, Rawat S. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Sepsis Prediction: A Scoping Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):516-524.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.