ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2022
The power of tears: Observers' brain responses show that tears provide unambiguous signals independent of scene context.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven biomarker learning for the early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: ABLEDx.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Experimental Analysis of Tear Fluid and Its Processing for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Only humans produce emotional tears, a fact that has been linked to triggering empathy, social bonding, and providing support in observers. Consequently, either the tears themselves play a crucial role in eliciting such behavior, or, alternatively, the negative context in which they are shed is responsible for these observers' reactions. The present study investigates whether the context in which we see an individual cry influences our perception of tears. We exposed participants (N = 13) to compound stimuli of faces with or without tears, combined with positive, negative, and scrambled backgrounds, while their brain activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Findings reveal that the lateral occipital gyrus responds to the presence of tears but that the contextual information does not influence this reaction; furthermore, tears appear to facilitate interpreting emotional facial expressions when combined with a positive context. These findings indicate that tears are a robust, unambiguous signal, the perception of which is insensitive to context but can still contribute to the context interpretation. This feature sets tears apart from other facial emotional expressions. This is likely due to their crucial evolutionary role as one of the foremost indicators of discomfort, signaling a need for help and their power to forge a bond between people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.