ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2025
Validation of the Saint Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Scale (SPECS) for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing a benchmark for patient comfort during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy using the St. Paul's Endoscopic Comfort Scale (SPECS).Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient comfort is an important predictor of patient satisfaction and a quality indicator in endoscopy. The St. Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Score (SPECS), previously validated for colonoscopy, was assessed for measuring patient comfort during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 3 groups of assessors (gastroenterologists, nurses, and observers) used SPECS and the modified Gloucester Comfort Scale (GS) to measure patients' comfort during outpatient EGD. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and satisfaction survey. Descriptive statistics and inter-rater reliability were calculated across the 3 groups for both tools. The correlation between SPECS, GS, and VAS was calculated. Results: Three hundred subjects were included. The mean age was 56.7 years (SD 14.7 years) and 160 (53.3%) were male. Overall, 89.0% ( Conclusions: SPECS is a reliable assessment tool to measure patient comfort during EGD. SPECS may be used to audit patient comfort at a facility and physician level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.