ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2025
Assessing the role of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response: an observational study.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Among Crohn's disease patients with loss of response or non-response to ustekinumab (UST), there remains no clear strategy for dose escalation. Moreover, clinical associations and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are poorly understood. This study assessed response to escalation of UST therapy via increased dosing frequency or re-induction, as well as assessed associations of response. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was performed. Adults who underwent dose escalation to every 4 weeks or reinduction of UST were included. The primary outcome was clinical and biochemical remission which was defined as a Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) of <5 and a C-reactive protein (CRP) level within the normal limit or a Fecal Calprotectin (FCP) level <250 ug/g. Partial response to treatment was defined as a 50% decrease from baseline HBI, CRP, or FCP. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median of 17 weeks (IQR 12-21). Clinical and biochemical remission was achieved in 30.8% of patients ( Conclusion: UST dose escalation, in the form of reinduction or increased frequency to every 4 weeks may be effective among patients with loss of response or partial response, though predictors of response and strategy of escalation remain unclear.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.