Highlights of the 2024 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Five-year implant-related complication rates of total hip arthroplasty performed for osteonecrosis were not improved by robotic-assisted or computer-navigated techniques.International orthopaedics · 2026
   Article
2. Public information-seeking about orthopedic surgical robotics: a decade-scale infodemiological analysis and forecast through 2030.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Article
3. Electrosprayed Chitosan-Calcium Phosphate Microshell Composite Coatings on Silanized Titanium Substrates.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
   Article
4. Asia-Pacific expert consensus on robotic-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026
   Review
5. Manual versus robotic-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty for instability : a one-year cohort analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026
   Article
6. The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk.Bone & joint research · 2026
   Article
7. Effectiveness of Manual Lymphatic Drainage After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
   Review
8. The anterior compartment in modern knee arthroplasty.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026
   Review
9. Machine Learning for Revision Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Distinct Challenges, Current Performance, and Clinical Readiness.Arthroplasty today · 2026
   Article
10. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Complex Primary and Revision Cases: A Systematic Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
11. Impact of osteoarthritis aetiology and implant constraint on the risk of secondary patellar resurfacing after total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) data.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026
    Article
12. Enhanced and express workflows in robotic total hip arthroplasty: A paired accuracy study using radiographic validation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
    Observational
13. [Robotics in knee arthroplasty : Current status and developments].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
14. Implant design may influence knee flexor activation patterns during stair ascent and descent.Bone & joint research · 2025
    Article
15. Time to Achieve a Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison of Robotic-Assisted, Navigation-Assisted, and Conventional Techniques.Arthroplasty today · 2025
    Article
16. Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Postoperative Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cureus · 2025
    Review
17. Modern Dual Mobility Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Stability, Survival, and Ion Safety Evaluation: The Comprehensive Review.JB & JS open access
    Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as