Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567279›Full record

ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2025

Modernizing Preclinical Drug Development: The Role of New Approach Methodologies.

Krina Mehta, Christian Maass, Lourdes Cucurull-Sanchez, Cesar Pichardo-Almarza, Kalyanasundaram Subramanian, Ioannis P Androulakis, Jogarao Gobburu, Stephan Schaller, Catherine M Sherwin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Krina MehtaKyowa Kirin Inc., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-6436
Christian MaassESQlabs GmbH, MPSlabs, 26683 Saterland, Germany.
Lourdes Cucurull-SanchezPharmetheus AB-UK Branch, Dover CT15 6DR, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-6490
Cesar Pichardo-AlmarzaAstraZeneca R&D, Systems Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0AA, U.K.
Kalyanasundaram SubramanianDifferentia Biotech Ltd, South San Francisco, California 94080, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-5427
Ioannis P AndroulakisBiomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.
Jogarao GobburuCenter for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Stephan SchallerESQlabs GmbH, 26683 Saterland, Germany.
Catherine M SherwinDifferentia Biotech Ltd, South San Francisco, California 94080, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0844-3207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 90% of investigational drugs fail during clinical development, largely due to poor translation of pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and toxicity data from preclinical to clinical settings. The high costs and ethical concerns associated with translational failures highlight the need for more efficient and reliable preclinical tools. Human-relevant new approach methodologies (NAMs), including advanced in vitro systems, in silico mechanistic models, and computational techniques like artificial intelligence and machine learning, can improve translational success, as evident by several literature examples. Case studies on physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and quantitative systems pharmacology applications demonstrate the potential of NAMs in improving translational accuracy, reducing reliance on animal studies. Additionally, mechanistic modeling approaches for drug-induced liver injury and tumor microenvironment models have provided critical insights into drug safety and efficacy. We propose a structured and iterative "a priori in silico" workflow that integrates NAM components to actively guide preclinical study designa step toward more predictive and resource-efficient drug development. The proposed workflow can enable in vivo predictions to guide the design of reduced and optimal preclinical studies. The findings from these preclinical studies can then be used to refine computational models to enhance the accuracy of human predictions or guide additional preclinical studies, as needed. To conclude, integrating computational and in vitro NAM approaches can optimize preclinical drug development, improving translational accuracy and reducing clinical trial failures. This paradigm shift is further supported by global regulations, such as the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 and EMA directive 2010/63/EU, underscoring the regulatory momentum toward adopting human-relevant NAMs as the new standard in preclinical drug development.

Indexed as

microphysiological systemnew approach methodologies (NAM)organ-on-chipphysiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)preclinical drug developmentquantitative systems pharmacology (QSP)

Identifiers

PMID40567279
PMCPMC12186754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.