ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Modernizing Preclinical Drug Development: The Role of New Approach Methodologies.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- MASLD, diabetes and PMOS across the female life stages.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- From Prediction to Decision Making: PBPK and QSP as Regulatory-Grade NAMs.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Assessing drug-induced liver injury liabilities in human and animal hepatocytes under static and perfused spheroid culture conditions.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Privileged nitrogen heterocycles in anticancer drug discovery: recent advances on imidazole, indole, and pyrimidine scaffolds.RSC advances · 2026Review
- New approach methodologies for next-generation risk assessment of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Article
- Minimal Computational Framework for Systematic Identification of Antimicrobial Targets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the anti-cancer properties of apigenin via targeting different molecular signatures: A Review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Model-Based Design of Sustained-Release Formulations of Anti-TNF-α Monoclonal Antibodies for Intravitreal Administration.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Quantitative systems toxicology: modelling to mechanistically understand and predict drug safety.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Design of synthetic selenopeptides with antioxidant activity for the treatment of XP and non-melanoma skin cancer.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk Management in First-in-Human Trials of Intravenous Drugs: Current Practices and Future Perspectives.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Processing and sectioning of organ donor spinal cord tissue for electrophysiology on acute human spinal cord slices.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Developing a QSPR model for Alzheimer's drugs using topological indices and M-polynomial: A computational study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models to Study Molecular Trafficking Across the Human Intestinal Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The therapeutic effects of various tonic traditional Chinese medicines on demyelinating diseases.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Beyond the amyloid hypothesis: leveraging human-centered complexFrontiers in toxicology · 2025Review
- Established and emerging new approach methodologies in neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-, organoid-, and organ-on-chip-powered models to improve pre-clinical animal testing of vaccines and immunotherapeutics: potential, progress, and challenges.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 90% of investigational drugs fail during clinical development, largely due to poor translation of pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and toxicity data from preclinical to clinical settings. The high costs and ethical concerns associated with translational failures highlight the need for more efficient and reliable preclinical tools. Human-relevant new approach methodologies (NAMs), including advanced in vitro systems, in silico mechanistic models, and computational techniques like artificial intelligence and machine learning, can improve translational success, as evident by several literature examples. Case studies on physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and quantitative systems pharmacology applications demonstrate the potential of NAMs in improving translational accuracy, reducing reliance on animal studies. Additionally, mechanistic modeling approaches for drug-induced liver injury and tumor microenvironment models have provided critical insights into drug safety and efficacy. We propose a structured and iterative "a priori in silico" workflow that integrates NAM components to actively guide preclinical study designa step toward more predictive and resource-efficient drug development. The proposed workflow can enable in vivo predictions to guide the design of reduced and optimal preclinical studies. The findings from these preclinical studies can then be used to refine computational models to enhance the accuracy of human predictions or guide additional preclinical studies, as needed. To conclude, integrating computational and in vitro NAM approaches can optimize preclinical drug development, improving translational accuracy and reducing clinical trial failures. This paradigm shift is further supported by global regulations, such as the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 and EMA directive 2010/63/EU, underscoring the regulatory momentum toward adopting human-relevant NAMs as the new standard in preclinical drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.