ArticleArchives of physiotherapy
Head Pain Reproduction and Resolution Behavior in Response to Sustained Mobilization of the Upper Cervical Spine: A Case Series.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reproduction and resolution of head pain with sustained upper cervical mobilization has been proposed as a diagnostic indicator of Cervicogenic Headache (CGH). However, there has been little focus on describing head pain response during the application of these maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to describe the head pain response during the performance of sustained upper cervical spine mobilization in people with probable CGH. Methods: In this case series of 20 individuals with probable CGH as defined under the International Headache Society criteria, were assessed by one experienced physiotherapist who administered five sustained upper cervical spine mobilization techniques to each participant. Reproduction of head pain during mobilization was noted. At the start, during, and end of each mobilization technique, change in head pain intensity and time taken to achieve head pain resolution was recorded. Results: Sixteen of the 20 participants experienced reproduction and resolution of head pain within 90 seconds of sustained upper cervical mobilization. This phenomenon occurred no more frequently with the mobilization of C2 than with C1. Eight patients reported this on the dominant head pain side only, 6 patients experienced this bilaterally. Neck pain was present in 13 of the 20 participants. Conclusion: From this case series, it seems that neither the duration (measured in seconds) nor the magnitude of reduction in head pain intensity was markedly different across dominant compared to non-dominant head pain sides or across cervical levels, indicating reproduction and resolution behavior is irregular. The presence of CGH without neck pain is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.