Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567221›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2025

'If her body responds then you know she wants it': a qualitative study on how young people in Ecuador and Uganda understand and practice consent.

Sara De Meyer, Katie Lau, Elizabeth Kemigisha, Ana Cevalllos, Lucia Rost, Kristien Michielsen, Anna Kågesten, Miranda van Reeuwijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara De MeyerIndependent Consultant, Carahue, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-8819
Katie LauIndependent Consultant (Previously SRHR Advisor, Plan International), Madrid, Spain.
Elizabeth KemigishaDepartment of Health and Wellbeing, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9137-8014
Ana CevalllosResearch Directorate, University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Lucia RostHead of Research, Plan International, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1191-572X
Kristien MichielsenInstitute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-6770
Anna KågestenDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-8319
Miranda van ReeuwijkRutgers International, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough progress has been made, adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) remain a global public health concern and continued investments are necessary. The way young people perceive, and experience sexual consent is at the centre of free and informed decision-making, a critical element of ASRHR. Nevertheless, the evidence on young people's views of sexual consent remains limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

objectivesTo explore how young people (aged 18 to 26) understand and practice sexual consent in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsQualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among 173 young people in Ecuador (Guayaquil) and Uganda (Kampala city), involving young people in data collection and analysis. The Hickman and Muehlenhard's (1999) framework was used to categorize the ways young people express sexual consent: direct and indirect verbal and nonverbal signals.

resultsWe found that reflecting on sexual consent was relatively new for many participants and challenging to define. Few young people seemed to know how to apply consent in their daily lives, explaining that asking consent was often not possible in their relationships and sexual encounters. Influencing factors such as gender norms, the type of relationship and age were mentioned. Non-direct, non-verbal consent were the most commonly used strategies, meaning that sexual consent was mostly interpreted from body language or indirect questions - opening a window for sexual risks.

conclusionOur findings call for SRHR programming that promotes communication and equality and supports skills in recognizing, giving and receiving sexual consent.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultDecision MakingEcuadorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUgandaYoung AdultEcuadorMaria EmmelinSexual consentUgandayouthyouth co-researchers

Identifiers

PMID40567221
PMCPMC12203704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.