Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567153›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology reports2025

Efficacy and Safety of Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist/Inverse Agonist Including Betahistine for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yasufumi Nishii, Kenji Sakuma, Shun Hamanaka, Nakao Iwata, Taro Kishi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasufumi NishiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Kenji SakumaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-0179
Shun HamanakaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Nakao IwataDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Taro KishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-2236

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 19K08082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWhether histamine H3 receptor antagonists (H3R-ANTs)/inverse agonists (H3R-IAs) provides benefit for the treatment of schizophrenia remains unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to address the above clinical question.

methodsCognitive Function Scale's composite score (primary), seven domains of cognitive function (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning/problem solving, and social cognition) score, University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment score, psychopathology scales score, discontinuation rate, and incidence of individual adverse events were among the study outcomes. The standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

resultsOur meta-analysis included 11 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 754). Our study evaluated ABT-288, betahistine, betahistine+reboxetine, GSK239512, MK-0249, and pitolisant. Betahistine has an H1-receptor agonistic reaction and H3-receptor antagonistic reaction, while other drugs only have an H3-receptor antagonistic/inverse agonistic reaction. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis for all outcomes divided by betahistine or other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs. The study results show that betahistine outperformed placebo in the improvement of overall cognitive symptoms (SMD [95% CI] = -0.61 [-1.03, -0.18]), speed of processing (-0.44 [-0.87, -0.02]), attention/vigilance (-0.43 [-0.85, -0.01]), working memory (-0.48 [-0.90, -0.06]), verbal learning (-0.62 [-1.04, -0.19]), visual learning (-0.57 [-1.00, -0.15]), and betahistine+reboxetine was superior in the improvement of depressive symptoms (-4.04 [-5.10, -2.97]). Pitolisant outperformed placebo in depressive symptom improvement (-3.24 [-4.22, -2.26]). However, the results were derived from one betahistine, betahistine+reboxetine, or pitolisant study. Other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs revealed risk of insomnia (RR [95% CI] = 2.18 [1.05, 4.55]). However, no differences were observed in other any outcomes between betahistine or other pooled H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs and placebo.

conclusionsSome H3R-ANTs/H3R-IAs might provide benefit for the treatment of cognitive symptoms and depressive symptoms in individuals afflicted with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBetahistineHistamine AgonistsHistamine H3 AntagonistsSchizophreniaCognitionDrug Inverse AgonismHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsBetahistineHistamine AgonistsHistamine H3 Antagonistsbetahistinehistamine H3 receptor antagonist or inverse agonistpitolisantschizophreniasystematic review and meta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID40567153
PMCPMC12198695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.