Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567095›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025

Airway assessment and management in head and neck cancer surgery.

Chiara Mossinelli, Giacomo Pietrobon, Stefano Zorzi, Marta Tagliabue, Francesco Chu, Emilia Tomarchio, Daniele Sances, Marco Venturino, Mohssen Ansarin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chiara MossinelliDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo PietrobonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano ZorziDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marta TagliabueDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ChuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Emilia TomarchioUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Daniele SancesDivision of Anesthesiology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marco VenturinoDivision of Anesthesiology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mohssen AnsarinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Head and neck cancer surgery (HNCS) is burdened by a great risk of difficult airway and adverse events during anaesthesia. This study describes our experience and provides a flowchart for airway management in HNCS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 910 surgically treated patients (January 2022- January 2023, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy). We selected malignant tumours of the upper airway and surgery performed under general anaesthesia. We report a descriptive analysis of the sample. The data collected were representative of our daily clinical practice and have been used to draw up a proposal for airway management in HNCS. Results: 200 consecutive patients (males 71.5%, females 28.5%), median age 67 years, were selected. The most represented sites were larynx (44.5%), oral cavity (30.5%), and oropharynx (20%). Airway management was obtained by orotracheal intubation (61%), nasotracheal intubation (15%), awake intubation under fibreoptic endoscopic control (15%), and tracheostomy under local anaesthesia (9%). In 3 cases we performed tracheostomy in an emergency setting (all patients affected by laryngeal cancer in a locally advanced stage). Conclusions: Airway management in HNCS represents a topic of compelling interest that requires careful planning, well-defined options of strategies, and close communication between anaesthesiologists and surgeons.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementHead and Neck NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesdifficult airwayhead and neck cancerintubationtracheostomyupper airway

Identifiers

PMID40567095
PMCPMC12201920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.