Observational studyActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025
Microsurgery in primary tumours of the parapharyngeal space: observational retrospective analysis of a series of consecutive cases.
Observational study in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parapharyngeal Schwannoma: Limitations Regarding Diagnosis and Surgical Intervention-A Case Report and Focused Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate safety and efficacy of the microsurgical approach to parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumour. A secondary goal was to evaluate the correspondence between preoperative and final histopathologic diagnosis after surgery. Methods: A consecutive series of primary PPS tumours treated between 1985 and 2022 in 2 tertiary referral centres with a microsurgical cervico-parotid approach was considered. The sample included 97 tumours (88 benign and 9 malignant) in 94 patients, of which 11 affected by recurrent tumours when first diagnosed at our centres. The surgical approaches, planned on the presumptive preoperative diagnosis, were pericapsular and en bloc resections (including either conservative or radical resections of the PPS). Results: Pericapsular and en bloc resections of the PPS achieved complete removal in 88 out of 97 tumours. Relapses after PPS microsurgery occurred only in 8 cases (4 pleomorphic adenomas, 2 malignant schwannomas, one melanoma, and one haemangiopericytoma). Four of the 8 relapsed cases were recurrent cases when first seen at our centres. A complete correspondence between preoperative diagnosis and final histology occurred only in the group of benign lesions classified as paraganglioma, schwannoma, or lipoma, submitted to pericapsular resection. Conclusions: Microsurgery may support the transcervical-parotid approach, by enhancing the operative space through narrow surgical corridors, improving dissection on critical cleavage planes, vessels and nerves, and allowing the exposure of both caudal and cranial extent of the lesions. In our series, pericapsular and en bloc resections of the PPS were effective in most of the included patients. In high-grade malignancies, where the morbidity of a wider resection beyond the PPS walls may include vessels and nerves, the indication should be accurately balanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.