Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567091›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of urology2025

Review of techniques and approaches for ectopic reservoir placement in inflatable penile implant.

Etan Eigner, Yacov Reisman, Nicola Fazza, Ameer Nsair, Valentin Shabataev, Ariel Zisman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Etan EignerDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.
Yacov ReismanSexual Health, Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital, Tel-Aviv, 6772829, Israel.
Nicola FazzaDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.
Ameer NsairDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.
Valentin ShabataevDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.
Ariel ZismanDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is the gold standard treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction who are refractory to medical therapy. The standard placement of the reservoir in the space of Retzius (SOR) may be contraindicated in patients with prior pelvic or abdominal surgery due to altered anatomy and increased risk of complications. This has led to the development of alternative ectopic reservoir placement techniques. In this narrative review, we summarize the literature on various ectopic reservoir approaches, including low and high submuscular placements, submuscular techniques with counter incisions or transfascial fixation, midline submuscular placement, subcutaneous placement, and lateral retroperitoneal approaches. We describe the surgical methods, outcomes, and complication rates associated with each technique. While most methods demonstrate low complication and revision rates, direct comparisons remain limited due to heterogeneity and lack of prospective data. This review highlights the importance of individualized technique selection based on prior surgical history, body habitus, and surgeon experience. As ectopic placement becomes more widely adopted, familiarity with multiple approaches is essential for prosthetic surgeons.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisHumansMaleProsthesis Designectopic reservoir placementerectile dysfunctioninflatable penile prosthesissurgical techniques

Identifiers

PMID40567091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.