ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025
Quality of life and surgical treatment regret in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy: a multicenter study.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of blue laser vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk of New-Onset Postoperative Depression After Holmium Laser Enucleation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Decision regret and patient satisfaction after TURP and Rezūm™ for benign prostatic obstruction: a retrospective comparative cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBenign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a common condition affecting men later in life, significantly impacting quality of life (QOL). Surgical intervention is often pursued when medical management fails, but patient satisfaction with outcomes varies. Decisional regret can affect perceived success and patient satisfaction post-surgery. This study evaluates the relationship between post-surgical symptoms and decisional regret across BPH procedures.
methodsA prospective, multicenter cohort study included 54 patients undergoing BPH surgery between March 2023 and February 2024. Patients completed the International Prostate Symptom Score-QOL (IPSS-QOL) scale preoperatively and at least three months postoperatively, along with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Surgical types included Urolift, Greenlight Laser, Rezum, Aquablation, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A DRS score of ≥25 indicated significant regret. Changes in IPSS-QOL were correlated with DRS scores (Spearman's rho), and subgroup comparisons were conducted using Mann-Whitney U tests.
resultsThe average DRS score was 18.3, with 33% of patients reporting a DRS ≥25. Moderate correlations existed between quality of life (QOL) change (ρ = 0.34, p < 0.05) and total regret score. Minimally invasive surgical treatment (MISTs) patients demonstrated higher regret correlations than TURP. Lack of efficacy (75%), new symptoms (41%), and postoperative complications (25%) were the most common reasons for regret.
conclusionWhile BPH surgery generally improves symptoms, a substantial portion of patients experience decisional regret. This underscores the importance of preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations and reduce regret. Further research should explore strategies to enhance shared decision-making and align patient expectations with possible surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40567090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.