ReviewCancer medicine2025
Narrative Review of Patient Cancer Tissue-Derived Zebrafish Xenograft Models for Evaluating Drug Sensitivity as an Avatar Model for Clinical Application.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heteronemin suppresses chemoresistant oral squamous cell carcinoma cells through ROS-mediated apoptosis and cuproptosis-associated mitochondrial stress.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Predicting Cisplatin Efficacy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Narrative Review of Patient Cancer Tissue-Derived Zebrafish Xenograft Models for Evaluating Drug Sensitivity as an Avatar Model for Clinical Application.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the pursuit of optimal medical care, treatment selection based on the molecular analysis of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes has been explored; however, this approach relies on data from large patient groups, resulting in limited accuracy in predicting treatment efficacy. Diseases involve complex pathological networks, requiring treatments that target multiple key molecules in these networks. Drug screening using these networks, which cannot be achieved through a gene expression analysis alone, requires animal models. Zebrafish embryos have an immature immune system, allowing for a high engraftment rate of human cancer cells transplanted within 48 h after fertilization. Consequently, the time required for engraftment is also reduced. Less than 500 human cancer cells are required for transplantation, enabling the assessment of drug efficacy from clinical samples within approximately 1 week. The cost of raising zebrafish is low, drug efficacy can be evaluated using small amounts of drugs, and their use aligns closely with animal welfare standards. This review aims to discuss the technical aspects of evaluating drug efficacy using zebrafish patient cancer tissue-derived xenograft (zPDX) models and summarize previous studies using zPDX as an avatar model for personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.