Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566994›Full record

SynthesisHIV medicine2025

Rapid start with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) as initial treatment in people with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1): A systematic literature review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Jade Ghosn, Jeremy Chow, Monica Gandhi, Miguel Górgolas, Aws Al-Hayani, Hansel Tookes, Max Lee, Emily F Kaiser, David Malebranche, Fernando Alvarez Bognar and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jade GhosnAPHP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2914-959X
Jeremy ChowUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Monica GandhiUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Miguel GórgolasFundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Aws Al-HayaniFundación Jiménez Díaz, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4648-7657
Hansel TookesUniversity of Miami - Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Max LeeCostello Medical, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily F KaiserCostello Medical, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David MalebrancheGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Fernando Alvarez BognarGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Bhumi Gandhi-PatelGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5605-1425
Lili DaiBeijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

Gilead Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment guidelines recommend rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation among eligible people with HIV to improve treatment outcomes and reduce HIV transmission. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen, is recommended for rapid start in US and European guidelines. This systematic literature review synthesized evidence on the efficacy, safety and effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of B/F/TAF rapid start among newly diagnosed people with HIV.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched in January 2024, supplemented by searches of conference proceedings and clinical trial records. English-language interventional studies of B/F/TAF rapid start among ART-naïve people with HIV reporting efficacy, safety or PROs were eligible. Study quality was assessed using York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination or Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions checklists. Results were synthesized narratively.

resultsAcross eight included studies, 745 people with HIV received B/F/TAF rapid start, 171 received rapid start comparators and 255 received non-rapid start comparators. At Weeks 24 and 48, 80%-94% and 74%-96% of people with HIV treated with B/F/TAF rapid start achieved viral load <50 copies/mL, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 0%-3%, and grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 0%-3% of people with HIV receiving B/F/TAF rapid start. Rapid start improved engagement in care over traditional non-rapid start approaches, and B/F/TAF rapid start reduced anxiety and improved quality of life among people with HIV. Limitations of the review included heterogeneous study definitions of "rapid start" and limited data availability.

conclusionsB/F/TAF rapid start was efficacious, safe and associated with high engagement in care and improved PROs.

Indexed as

AdenineAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHIV InfectionsTenofovirAlanineAmidesDrug CombinationsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV-1HumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPiperazinesPyridonesTreatment OutcomeAdenineAlanineAmidesAnti-HIV Agentsbictegravirbictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide, drug combinationDrug CombinationsEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsPiperazinesPyridonesTenofovirtenofovir alafenamideadherenceengagement in careimmediate startquality of lifesafetyviral suppression

Identifiers

PMID40566994
PMCPMC12400494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.