Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566882›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Elevated CO

Yolima Carrillo, Laura Castañeda-Gómez, Johanna Wong-Bajracharya, Jonathan M Plett, Krista L Plett

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yolima CarrilloHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-4601
Laura Castañeda-GómezTerraCarbon LLC, Peoria, IL, 61614, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-4672
Johanna Wong-BajracharyaHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-8645
Jonathan M PlettHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-8146
Krista L PlettElizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Menangle, NSW, 2568, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-3754

Funding

Australian Research Council DP130102501Australian Research Council DP160102684Western Sydney University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) can influence soil carbon (C) accrual and loss. The mechanisms and environmental controls of this balance are unclear, and direct evidence is needed. We assessed the influence of atmospheric CO

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon DioxideMycorrhizaeNutrientsSoilCarbon IsotopesEucalyptusNitrogenSoil MicrobiologySpecies SpecificityCarbonCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesNitrogenNutrientsSoilclimate changedissolved organic carbonectomycorrhizaelevated CO2nitrogenrhizosphere primingsoil carbon

Identifiers

PMID40566882
PMCPMC12529034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.