Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566872›Full record

ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho

Reducing Protein Levels in Diets for Local Pig Breeds: A Case Study on Fat-Type Krškopolje Pig.

Martin Škrlep, Klavdija Poklukar, Sam Millet, Marjeta Čandek-Potokar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin ŠkrlepAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Klavdija PoklukarAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sam MilletAnimal Science Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Melle, Belgium.
Marjeta Čandek-PotokarAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

European Commission, H2020 101000236Ministry of Agriculture, forestry and food L7-4568Ministry of Agriculture, forestry and food V4-2201Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency J4-3094, P4-0133, V4-2201, L7-4568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of reduced dietary protein levels in fat-type local breed Krškopolje pig in conventional indoor and organic outdoor systems. Two tests were conducted: one in conventional system (n = 28 pigs) and one in organic outdoor system (n = 24 pigs). Two dietary strategies varying in crude protein (CP) level were tested: control, high protein (HP) with phases of 15%, 12.5%, and 10% CP content and low protein (LP) with phases of 15% and 10% CP content. The ingredients used were identical, but in the organic diet, they came from organic agriculture. The feed was offered ad libitum. Feed distribution was recorded, pigs were weighed, and the thickness of the backfat and longissimus lumborum muscle was measured with ultrasound. After 228 days, pigs were slaughtered, and carcass and meat quality were assessed. Modeling growth data with InraPorc indicated that protein and essential amino acid requirements were generally met, except for lysine in the LP diets, which appeared with the transition to a 10% protein diet. Lysine deficiency was more pronounced in the organic than in conventional system. Overall growth rate was similar in LP and HP groups. There were no pertinent differences in carcass or meat quality.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietDietary ProteinsDiet, Protein-RestrictedFood QualityAmino Acids, EssentialAnimalsLysineMeatNutritional RequirementsSwineAmino Acids, EssentialDietary ProteinsLysineInraPorcKrškopolje pigmodelingnutritionproduction system

Identifiers

PMID40566872
PMCPMC12198716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.