ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Incorporating Multiple Imputation Into Tanezumab Dose-Response Modeling of WOMAC Pain CFB Across Six Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple imputation is increasingly being used to deal with missing data in clinical trials. It is a simulation approach leading to multiple analyses of a pre-defined number of datasets. For a pre-defined statistical model, this is relatively straightforward, but for model development as typically conducted in Pharmacometrics, it is unclear how such an approach could be implemented. This case study describes how this was addressed at the time of a regulatory submission and considers alternative approaches which could be adopted in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.