Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566780›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2025

[Thyroid nodule segmentation method integrating receiving weighted key-value architecture and spherical geometric features].

Licheng Zhu, Guohui Wei

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Licheng ZhuCollege of Medical Information Engineering, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, P. R. China.
Guohui WeiCollege of Medical Information Engineering, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the high computational complexity of the Transformer in the segmentation of ultrasound thyroid nodules and the loss of image details or omission of key spatial information caused by traditional image sampling techniques when dealing with high-resolution, complex texture or uneven density two-dimensional ultrasound images, this paper proposes a thyroid nodule segmentation method that integrates the receiving weighted key-value (RWKV) architecture and spherical geometry feature (SGF) sampling technology. This method effectively captures the details of adjacent regions through two-dimensional offset prediction and pixel-level sampling position adjustment, achieving precise segmentation. Additionally, this study introduces a patch attention module (PAM) to optimize the decoder feature map using a regional cross-attention mechanism, enabling it to focus more precisely on the high-resolution features of the encoder. Experiments on the thyroid nodule segmentation dataset (TN3K) and the digital database for thyroid images (DDTI) show that the proposed method achieves dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 87.24% and 80.79% respectively, outperforming existing models while maintaining a lower computational complexity. This approach may provide an efficient solution for the precise segmentation of thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedThyroid NoduleAlgorithmsHumansThyroid GlandUltrasonographyFeature fusionImage segmentationReceiving weighted key-value architectureSpherical geometric featureThyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID40566780
PMCPMC12236226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.