ArticleBiophysical journal2025
A multiscale theory for mesenchymal cell migration in straight or curved channel confinement.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Materials and measurement in mechanobiology.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal cells navigate the extracellular matrix (ECM) in vivo by processing both its mechanical properties and confinement geometry. Here, we develop a multiscale whole-cell theory to investigate cell spreading and migration in two-dimensional viscoelastic channel confinements of varying width and curvature. Our simulations show that, in straight channels, the cell migration speed depends monotonically on the substrate elastic stiffness, which is otherwise biphasic on an unconfined substrate. This is because confinement enforces directional spreading while reducing the spreading area, which results in lower intracellular viscous drag on the nucleus and a higher net traction force of polarized cells in our model. In contrast, we find that confinement curvature slows down cell migration since the friction forces between the bending cell and the confinement walls increase with curvature. We validate our model with experimental data for cell migration in straight channels spanning a wide range of the ECM stiffness as well as in curved channels. Our model illuminates the intertwined effects of substrate viscoelasticity and confinement geometry on cell spreading and migration in complex microenvironments, revealing that channel curvature can override substrate mechanics to dominate migration regulation. The study paves the way for designing scaffolds that leverage curvature and confinement to steer controllable cell migration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.