ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Rice Pest Management Through RP11: A Scientifically Annotated Dataset for Adult Insect Recognition.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rice yields are expected to drop significantly due to the increasing spread of rice pests. Detecting rice pests in a timely manner using deep learning models has become a prevalent approach for rapid pest control. However, current datasets related to rice pests often suffer from limited sample sizes or poorly annotated labels, which compromises the training accuracy of deep learning models. Building upon the large-scale IP102 dataset, this study refines the rice pest segment of IP102 by separating adult specimens and larva specimens, acquiring additional pest images via web crawler techniques, and re-annotating all adult samples. The pest category names, originally in English, are replaced with the Latin scientific names of the corresponding families to improve both clarity and scientific accuracy. The resulting dataset, designated RP11, includes 11 adult categories with 4559 images and 7 larval categories with 2467 images. All annotations follow a labeling format compatible with YOLO model training. The sample count in RP11 is approximately four times that of the rice-specific subset in IP102. In this work, YOLOv11 was employed to evaluate RP11's performance, with IP102 serving as a comparison dataset. The results demonstrate that RP11 outperforms IP102 in precision (83.0% vs. 58.9%), recall (79.7% vs. 63.1%), F1-score (81.3% vs. 60.9%), mAP50 (87.2% vs. 62.0%), and mAP50-95 (73.3% vs. 37.9%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.