ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Using the Deep Learning Algorithm to Determine the Presence of Sacroiliitis from Pelvic Radiographs.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic and prognostic performance of artificial intelligence and radiomics in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) techniques have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in recognizing complex patterns in medical imaging data. In recent years, DL has been increasingly applied in clinical medicine for disease diagnosis and progression prediction. This study aimed to develop and validate a DL model for detecting sacroiliitis using pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. We retrospectively analyzed 1853 patients with pelvic AP radiographs, including 3706 sacroiliac joints (SIJs). Pelvic AP radiographs served as input data for the DL model development, while the presence or absence of sacroiliitis confirmed by pelvic computed tomography (CT) was used as the reference standard output data. Based on CT findings, 1463 of 1853 right SIJs showed evidence of sacroiliitis, while 390 had no sacroiliitis. Similar findings were observed in the left SIJs. The dataset was split with 70% (1297 images) for training and 30% (556 images) for validation. The areas under the curve (AUC) for our DL model on the validation dataset were 0.871 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.834-0.907) and 0.869 (95% CI: 0.834-0.907) for the left and right SIJs, respectively. Diagnostic accuracies for sacroiliitis on the left and right sides were 85.4% and 86.3%, respectively. These results demonstrate that a DL model trained on pelvic AP radiographs with CT-confirmed diagnoses can effectively aid in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.