ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2025
The Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Approaches for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Theoretical Cadaveric Model.
Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Time, Intensity, and Total Dose Parameters on the Ultrasound Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis: An In Vitro Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Electrolysis for Musculoskeletal Disorders Management in Rehabilitation Settings: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatellar tendinopathy is a musculoskeletal pain condition capable of impairing physical or sport activities. Preliminary evidence supports the efficacy of percutaneous electrolysis (PE) in reducing pain and related disability in patients with patellar tendinopathy.
objectiveThis study proposes a theoretical model for the application of a percutaneous electrolysis approach targeting the deep zone of the proximal and distal parts of the patellar tendon in both human (ultrasound-guided) and fresh cadaver (not ultrasound-guided) models.
methodsA filiform solid needle was inserted from the lateral side of the patellar tendon targeting two areas: 1, the deep proximal interface of the Hoffa's fat pad; and 2, the distal insertion of the patellar tendon at the tibial tuberosity in 10 fresh cadavers and in 10 healthy individuals. The patellar tendon, the saphenous nerve, and the infrapatellar nerve and its branches were identified by dissecting fresh cadavers to determine the anatomical trajectory of the infrapatellar nerve branches in relation to the needle.
resultsThe cadaveric model shows an anatomical relationship between the patellar tendon and infrapatellar nerve branches at the medial part of the knee. Infrapatellar nerve branches ran subcutaneously obliquely from the medial to the anterior and lateral parts of the knee, crossing in front of the patellar tendon. In all cadavers, the superior and inferior infrapatellar branches ran through the superior or inferior parts of the medial knee area. Only in 2/10 knees infrapatellar nerve branches reached the lateral part of the knee, specifically the superior lateral part. No neurovascular bundle of infrapatellar nerve branches was pierced in any insertion when the needle was inserted from the lateral part of the knee.
conclusionThis anatomical model supports the use of a lateral approach as a potentially safe approach to apply in needling interventions, e.g., percutaneous electrolysis for patellar tendinopathies. The infrapatellar nerve branches are vulnerable to needle procedures applied through the anteromedial side of the knee.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.