Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566392›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Nicotine Dependence in a Banned Market: Biomarker Evidence from E-Cigarette Users in São Paulo, Brazil.

Jaqueline Ribeiro Scholz, Elaine Cristine D'Amico, Juliana Takitane, Daniele Mayumi Sinagawa, João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia, Marcelo Filonzi Dos Santos, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Guilherme Vinicius Marques, Eric Nagamine Lima, Diana Fernanda Lasso Rodriguez and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lung cancer screening: an urgent necessity.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jaqueline Ribeiro ScholzServiço de Prevencao e Reabilitacao, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4139-8516
Elaine Cristine D'AmicoSecretaria de Estado da Saúde, Vigilância Sanitária Estadual, Sao Paulo 01246-901, Brazil.
Juliana TakitaneDepartamento de Medicina Legal, Bioetica, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Fisica e Reabilitacao-LIM40, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4581-7685
Daniele Mayumi SinagawaDepartamento de Medicina Legal, Bioetica, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Fisica e Reabilitacao-LIM40, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
João Mauricio Castaldelli-MaiaDepartamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-2291
Marcelo Filonzi Dos SantosDepartamento de Medicina Legal, Bioetica, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Fisica e Reabilitacao-LIM40, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Rodrigo Alves de OliveiraDepartamento de Medicina Legal, Bioetica, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Fisica e Reabilitacao-LIM40, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-3049-3792
Guilherme Vinicius MarquesFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Eric Nagamine LimaFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Diana Fernanda Lasso RodriguezFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Sara ZiottiServiço de Prevencao e Reabilitacao, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-5740-9564
Vilma LeytonDepartamento de Medicina Legal, Bioetica, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Fisica e Reabilitacao-LIM40, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-1290
Maria Cristina MegidSecretaria de Estado da Saúde, Vigilância Sanitária Estadual, Sao Paulo 01246-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although electronic cigarettes have been banned in Brazil since 2009, their use is increasing, particularly among youth. We conducted a biomarker-based study to profile exclusive e-cigarette users in São Paulo and to examine the associations of e-cigarette use with salivary nicotine and cotinine levels. A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted between April and September 2024 in six municipalities in São Paulo, Brazil. Randomly selected participants who reported exclusive use of electronic cigarettes completed a questionnaire and provided oral fluid samples for the determination of their nicotine and cotinine concentrations using LC-MS/MS. The cohort consisted of N = 417 participants. Significant associations were found between nicotine and cotinine concentrations and variables such as knowledge of nicotine content and product type. Addiction status significantly influenced the nicotine and cotinine concentrations, as well as smoking history, last consumption, recharge/purchase frequency, and consumption duration (all

Indexed as

CotinineElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineTobacco Use DisorderAdolescentAdultBiomarkersBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalivaYoung AdultBiomarkersCotinineNicotineelectronic cigarettesnicotine or derivativestoxicology

Identifiers

PMID40566392
PMCPMC12193091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.