ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Users' Perceptions of Access to and Quality of Public Health Services in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study in Metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, Including Pharmaceutical Services.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Users' Perspectives on Primary Care and Public Health Services in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study with Implications for Healthcare Quality Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates one of the five regions of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, as part of a broader research project examining users' perceptions of the Unified Health System (SUS), which has already generated publications in previous phases. The aim was to assess users' perceptions of the SUS regarding access to and the quality of public health services, including pharmaceutical services, in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro State.
methodA cross-sectional study was conducted between January and August 2024 with 200 participants, using a 66-item survey addressing access to and the quality of SUS services, appointment scheduling, medication acquisition, and the pharmacist's role. Associations between variables were investigated using the Pearson Chi-Square Test in R software.
resultsFrequent SUS users rated access as very good/good (
conclusionsA universal health system should cover diverse regions with unique needs. However, 49.4% of participants stated they never received information on how to store their medicines, and 42.3% reported never encountering a pharmacist in public pharmacies. Further ongoing studies assessing user perceptions are essential to ensure users play a central role in health decision-making, contributing to the system's strengthening and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.