ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
A Data-Driven Analysis of Work-Related Accidents in the Brazilian Mining Sector (2019-2022).
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study applied data analysis techniques to analyze work-related accidents in Brazil's mining sector from 2019 onward, identifying key risks and patterns. Using public datasets from governmental sources, it categorized accidents by the type of injury, causal agents, and affected body parts. The methodology employed included data cleaning, processing, and the development of interactive visualizations using advanced analytical tools, such as Python and Power BI, to facilitate data interpretation. Among the most significant events, the Brumadinho tailings dam collapse in 2019 emerged as a major outlier, substantially affecting multiple aspects of the analysis. This single incident accounted for 71.7% of all work-related fatalities recorded during the four-year period under study, highlighting its disproportionate impact on the dataset. This study also examined the main causes and consequences of mining accidents and facilitated the creation of victim profiles based on gender and age group, incorporating psychological theories regarding risk perception. It was concluded that, although the mining sector represents a small fraction of all work-related accidents in Brazil, the proportion of accidents relative to the number of workers in the sector is substantial, highlighting the need for stricter occupational safety management. The results can guide regulations and help companies and institutions to create safer, more sustainable mining policies. The methodology proved to be highly suitable, indicating its potential for application in safety analysis across other sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.