ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Predicting Low Birth Weight in Big Cities in the United States Using a Machine Learning Approach.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLow birth weight is a serious public health problem even in developed countries. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of machine learning to predict low birth weight rates in big cities in the USA on an ecological/population level. STUDY
designThe study was based on publicly available data from the Big Cities Health Inventory Data Platform. The collected data related to the 35 largest, most urban cities in the United States from 2010 to 2022. The model-agnostic approach was used to assess and visualize the magnitude and direction of the most influential predictors.
resultsThe models showed excellent performance with R-squared values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.81, and 0.79, and residual root mean squared error values of 1.06, 0.87, 1.03, 0.99 for KNN, Best subset, Lasso, and XGBoost, respectively. It is noteworthy that the Best subset selection approach had a high RSq and the lowest residual root mean squared error, with only a four-predictor subset. Influential predictors that appeared in three/four models were rate of chlamydia infection, racial segregation, prenatal care, percentage of single-parent families, and poverty. Other important predictors were the rate of violent crimes, life expectancy, mental distress, income inequality, hazardous air quality, prevalence of hypertension, percent of foreign-born citizens, and smoking. This study was limited by the unavailability of data on gestational age.
conclusionsThe machine learning algorithms showed excellent performance for the prediction of low birth weight rate in big cities. The identification of influential predictors can help local and state authorities and health policy decision makers to more effectively tackle this important health problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.