Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

A Quantitative Study on Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in a Mandatory Vaccination Workplace Setting in South Africa.

Dhirisha Naidoo, Bernard Hope Taderera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhirisha NaidooBroadReach Health Development, Bridgeway Precinct, Century City, Cape Town 7441, South Africa.
Bernard Hope TadereraDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resulted in significant morbidity and mortality globally. Despite the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing morbidity and mortality, uptake in South Africa was sub-optimal due to a number of factors which remain not fully understood, particularly in mandatory vaccination workplace settings. This quantitative, cross-sectional study aimed to understand determinants of COVID-19 vaccination uptake among clinical and non-clinical workers, aged 18 years and older, employed at a large organisation with a mandatory workplace COVID-19 vaccination policy in South Africa. Workers completed a one-off, self-administered, online questionnaire that explored determinants of COVID-19 vaccination, barriers and enablers to accessing vaccines, and perspectives regarding the mandatory workplace vaccine policy. Among the 88 workers enrolled in the study, the frequent reasons for COVID-19 vaccination included preventing the spread of COVID-19 (71%,

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMandatory ProgramsVaccinationWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMandatory VaccinationMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2South AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19determinants of COVID-19 vaccinationhealth workersmandatory vaccine policySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40566355
PMCPMC12193624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.