Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Colorectal Cancer and the Risk of Mortality Among Individuals with Suicidal Ideation.

Srikanta Banerjee, Jagdish Khubchandani, Stanley Nkemjika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srikanta BanerjeeCollege of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6872-4983
Jagdish KhubchandaniCollege of Health, Education, and Social Transformation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9058-4278
Stanley NkemjikaDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7592-5487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a major public health problem that has grown at alarming rates in the last two decades. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer deaths in the United States in both males and females. However, the influence of suicidal ideation (SI) on the association between CRC and risk of mortality has not been well examined.

methodsFor this study, the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative survey of United States adults aged 20 years or older, was utilized. CRC survivorship was determined from self-reported data on CRC, and mortality was ascertained by linking the NHANES data with death files from the National Death Index up to December 2019. Suicidal ideation (SI) confirmation was based on a response to a survey question.

resultsPeople with SI had a significantly higher rate (12.3% vs. 7.5%,

conclusionsIn this first national study in the U.S., we found that SI and CRC combined had worse mortality outcomes than CRC alone. Additionally, people with CRC were more likely to experience frequent SI. Our findings underscore the importance of mental healthcare and psychological well-being promotion among individuals with chronic diseases and the high need for integrated care approaches that address both physical and mental health needs.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSuicidal IdeationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adultcolorectal cancermortality risksuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID40566289
PMCPMC12192765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.