SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contexts.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The research aims to systematize the current scientific evidence on methodologies used to investigate the impact of the indoor built environment on well-being, focusing on indoor environmental quality (IEQ) variables such as thermal comfort, air quality, noise, and lighting. This systematic review adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and PRISMA guidelines to assess empirical studies that incorporate physiological measurements like heart rate, skin temperature, and brain activity, which are captured through various techniques in real-life contexts. The principal results reveal a significant interest in the relationship between the built environment and physiological as well as psychological states. For instance, thermal comfort was found to be the most commonly studied IEQ variable, affecting heart activity and skin temperature. The research also identifies the need for a shift towards using advanced technologies like Mobile Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI) for capturing real-time physiological data in natural settings. Major conclusions include the need for a multi-level, evidence-based approach that considers the dynamic interaction between the brain, body, and environment. This study advocates for the incorporation of multiple physiological signals to gain a comprehensive understanding of well-being in relation to the built environment. It also highlights gaps in current research, such as the absence of noise as a studied variable of IEQ and the need for standardized well-being assessment tools. By synthesizing these insights, the research aims to pave the way for future studies that can inform better design and policy decisions for indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.