ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Long-Range Dependence in Word Time Series: The Cosine Correlation of Embeddings.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyze long-range dependence (LRD) for word time series, understood as a slower than exponential decay of the two-point Shannon mutual information. We achieve this by examining the decay of the cosine correlation, a proxy object defined in terms of the cosine similarity between word2vec embeddings of two words, computed by an analogy to the Pearson correlation. By the Pinsker inequality, the squared cosine correlation between two random vectors lower bounds the mutual information between them. Using the Standardized Project Gutenberg Corpus, we find that the cosine correlation between word2vec embeddings exhibits a readily visible stretched exponential decay for lags roughly up to 1000 words, thus corroborating the presence of LRD. By contrast, for the Human vs. LLM Text Corpus entailing texts generated by large language models, there is no systematic signal of LRD. Our findings may support the need for novel memory-rich architectures in large language models that exceed not only hidden Markov models but also Transformers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.