Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566170›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Towards Identifying Objectivity in Short Informal Text.

Chaowei Zhang, Cheng Zhao, Zewei Zhang, Yuchao Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chaowei ZhangThe Department of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-5318
Cheng ZhaoThe Department of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Zewei ZhangThe Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Yuchao HuangThe Future Design Laboratory of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62403412the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province of China 23KJB520040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short informal texts are increasingly prevalent in modern communication, often containing fragmented grammar, personal opinions, and limited context. Traditional NLP tasks for the texts ordinarily focus on the subjective aspect learning, such as sentiment analysis and polarity classification. The study of learning objectivity from the texts is similarly significant, which can benefit many real-world applications including information filtering, content verification, etc. Unfortunately, this study is not being explored. This paper proposes a novel task that aims at identifying objectivity in short informal texts. Inspired by the characteristics of objective statements that normally need complete syntax structures for knowledge expression and delivery, we try to leverage the viewpoint of subjects (U), the tense of predicates (V), and the viewpoint of objects (O) as critical factors for objectivity learning. Upon that, we further propose a two-stage objectivity identification approach: (1) a UVO quantification module is implemented via a proposed OpenIE and large language model (LLM)-based triple feature quantification procedure; (2) an objectivity identification module employs pre-trained base models like BERT or RoBERTa that are constrained with the quantified UVO. The experimental result demonstrates our approach can outperform the base models up to 5.91% in objective-F1 and up to 6.97% in accuracy.

Indexed as

large language modelsobjectivity learningrelational triplesshort informal texts

Identifiers

PMID40566170
PMCPMC12192266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.