ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Identifying Objectivity in Short Informal Text.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short informal texts are increasingly prevalent in modern communication, often containing fragmented grammar, personal opinions, and limited context. Traditional NLP tasks for the texts ordinarily focus on the subjective aspect learning, such as sentiment analysis and polarity classification. The study of learning objectivity from the texts is similarly significant, which can benefit many real-world applications including information filtering, content verification, etc. Unfortunately, this study is not being explored. This paper proposes a novel task that aims at identifying objectivity in short informal texts. Inspired by the characteristics of objective statements that normally need complete syntax structures for knowledge expression and delivery, we try to leverage the viewpoint of subjects (U), the tense of predicates (V), and the viewpoint of objects (O) as critical factors for objectivity learning. Upon that, we further propose a two-stage objectivity identification approach: (1) a UVO quantification module is implemented via a proposed OpenIE and large language model (LLM)-based triple feature quantification procedure; (2) an objectivity identification module employs pre-trained base models like BERT or RoBERTa that are constrained with the quantified UVO. The experimental result demonstrates our approach can outperform the base models up to 5.91% in objective-F1 and up to 6.97% in accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.