ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Outlier Detection and Explanation Method Based on FOLOF Algorithm.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Outlier mining constitutes an essential aspect of modern data analytics, focusing on the identification and interpretation of anomalous observations. Conventional density-based local outlier detection methodologies frequently exhibit limitations due to their inherent lack of data preprocessing capabilities, consequently demonstrating degraded performance when applied to novel or heterogeneous datasets. Moreover, the computation of the outlier factor for each sample in these algorithms results in considerably higher computational cost, especially in the case of large datasets. This paper introduces a local outlier detection method named FOLOF (FCM Objective Function-based LOF) through an examination of existing algorithms. The approach starts by applying the elbow rule to determine the optimal number of clusters in the dataset. Subsequently, the FCM objective function is employed to prune the dataset to extract a candidate set of outliers. Finally, a weighted local outlier factor detection algorithm computes the degree of anomaly for each sample in the candidate set. For the analysis, the Golden Section method was used to classify the outliers. The underlying causes of these outliers can be revealed by exploring the anomalous properties of each outlier data point through the outlier factors of each dimension property. This approach has been validated on artificial datasets, the UCI dataset, and an NBA player dataset to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.