Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566169›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Outlier Detection and Explanation Method Based on FOLOF Algorithm.

Lei Bai, Jiasheng Wang, Yu Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei BaiSchool of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4409-3125
Jiasheng WangEngineering Training Center, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China.
Yu ZhouSchool of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U1504622Project of Cultivation Programme for Young Backbone Teachers of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province 2018GGJS079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outlier mining constitutes an essential aspect of modern data analytics, focusing on the identification and interpretation of anomalous observations. Conventional density-based local outlier detection methodologies frequently exhibit limitations due to their inherent lack of data preprocessing capabilities, consequently demonstrating degraded performance when applied to novel or heterogeneous datasets. Moreover, the computation of the outlier factor for each sample in these algorithms results in considerably higher computational cost, especially in the case of large datasets. This paper introduces a local outlier detection method named FOLOF (FCM Objective Function-based LOF) through an examination of existing algorithms. The approach starts by applying the elbow rule to determine the optimal number of clusters in the dataset. Subsequently, the FCM objective function is employed to prune the dataset to extract a candidate set of outliers. Finally, a weighted local outlier factor detection algorithm computes the degree of anomaly for each sample in the candidate set. For the analysis, the Golden Section method was used to classify the outliers. The underlying causes of these outliers can be revealed by exploring the anomalous properties of each outlier data point through the outlier factors of each dimension property. This approach has been validated on artificial datasets, the UCI dataset, and an NBA player dataset to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Indexed as

golden sectionobjective functionoutlier analysisoutlier detectionoutlier factorprune

Identifiers

PMID40566169
PMCPMC12192017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.