ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Stock Returns Using Fundamental, Technical, and Entropy-Based Strategies: A Semantic-Augmented Hybrid Approach.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-Sensitive Machine Learning for Financial Decision Modeling Under Imbalanced Data: Evidence from Bank Telemarketing.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Entropy-Augmented Forecasting and Portfolio Construction at the Industry-Group Level: A Causal Machine-Learning Approach Using Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of combining semantic intelligence drawn from large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4o with traditional machine-learning (ML) algorithms to develop predictive portfolio strategies for NASDAQ-100 stocks over the 2020-2025 period. Three different predictive frameworks--fundamental, technical, and entropy-based--are tested through examination of novel combinations of ML- and LLM-derived semantic metrics. The empirical results reveal a considerable divergence in optimal blending methods across the methodologies; namely, the technical methodology exhibits the best performance when using only ML predictions, with around 1978% cumulative returns with monthly rebalancing. In contrast, the fundamental methodology achieves its full potential when it is based primarily on LLM-derived semantic insights. The Entropy methodology is improved by a balanced combination of both semantic and ML signals, thus highlighting the potential of LLMs to improve predictive power by offering interpretative context for complex market interactions. These findings highlight the strategic importance of tailoring the semantic-algorithmic fusion to suit the nature of the predictive data and the investment horizon, with significant implications for portfolio management and future research in financial modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.