Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40566105›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Pain Neuroscience Education on Reducing Opioid Dependency in African American and Caucasian Populations: A Narrative Review.

Austin Granger, Ersilia Mirabelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Austin GrangerMacon Rehabilitation and Performance, Macon, GA 31210, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2218-9023
Ersilia MirabelliDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, School of Health Sciences, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 24515, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores pain neuroscience education (PNE) in the context of opioid dependence among Caucasian and African American populations, addressing disparities and sociocultural influences in the opioid epidemic. Von Bertalanffy's general systems theory and Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory comprise the underlying theoretical frameworks behind the review, emphasizing the importance of biopsychosocial perspectives of chronic pain and ecological systems on individual development. Within these frameworks, the study objective is to summarize relevant and contemporary literature among African American and Caucasian populations regarding opioid dependency, neuroplasticity in chronic pain, and PNE. Peer-reviewed articles published within the last 10 years were reviewed for relevance. Limitations include a lack of research on the intersection of ethnicity and PNE, a lack of studies investigating interdisciplinary input regarding PNE, and a focus on only two ethnic groups. This narrative review finds that African Americans face systemic barriers to effective treatment for pain and opioid use disorder (OUD), while Caucasians are more likely to be overprescribed with higher rates of OUD. From a systems and ecological perspective, maladaptive neuroplasticity in chronic pain (biologic subsystem) intersects with ethnic disparities in prescribing access and pain beliefs (psychosocial subsystem) to influence opioid use and the chronic pain experience. PNE shows promise as an adjunct to traditional physical therapy in reducing nociplastic pain, potentially affecting opioid dependency. Future research should incorporate readiness-to-change models, generational and ethnocultural perspectives, and neuroimaging with PNE to optimize the delivery of PNE to individuals of different backgrounds.

Indexed as

chronic painethnoculturalneuroplasticitynociplastic painopioidsopioid use disorderpain neuroscience education

Identifiers

PMID40566105
PMCPMC12194401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.