ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic and Ultrasound Imaging for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Care of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An International Survey.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Engineering Functional Biomaterials for Targeted and Localized Cancer Drug Delivery: A Structure-Property-Performance Design Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rheumatology and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: From Pattern Recognition to Signal Analysis and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Emerging Role of Ultrasonography in Ulcerative Colitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Intestinal Ultrasound in the Personalized Management of IBD.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Recent Endoscopic Technological Advancements in Crohn's Stricture Dilation.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Treat-to-Target in Ulcerative Colitis: How Soon Is Now?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable Artificial Neural Network Models for Predicting Anti-Adalimumab Immune Complex and Serum Drug Level in Crohn's Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming imaging modalities in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly in endoscopy and ultrasound. Despite their critical roles, both modalities are challenged by interobserver variability, subjectivity, and accessibility issues. AI offers significant potential to address these limitations by enhancing lesion detection, standardizing disease activity scoring, and supporting clinical decision-making. In endoscopy, deep convolutional neural networks have achieved high accuracy in detecting mucosal abnormalities and grading disease severity, reducing observer dependency and improving diagnostic consistency. AI-assisted colonoscopy systems have also demonstrated improvements in procedural quality metrics, including adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times. Similarly, AI applications in intestinal ultrasound show promise in automating measurements of bowel wall thickness, assessing vascularity, and distinguishing between inflammatory and fibrotic strictures, which are critical for tailored therapy decisions. Video capsule endoscopy has likewise benefited from AI, reducing interpretation times and enhancing the detection of subtle lesions. Despite these advancements, implementation challenges, including dataset quality, standardization, AI interpretability, clinician acceptance, and regulatory and ethical considerations, must be carefully addressed. The current review focuses on the most recent developments in the integration of AI into experimental designs, medical devices, and clinical workflows for optimizing diagnostic accuracy, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes in IBD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.