ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Incidence and Risk Factors of Dysphagia After Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A national analysis of outcomes associated with laryngeal complications among older adults undergoing cardiac surgery.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Comparison between dysphagia aortica and dysphagia after cardiac surgery using videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.BMC surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysphagia is a serious complication following cardiac surgery, associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs. Variability in the incidence and risk factors highlights the need for consolidated evidence. This scoping review aimed to analyze the incidence of dysphagia after cardiac surgery and identify the associated risk factors. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and PEDro databases for observational studies reporting dysphagia incidence and risk factors in adult cardiac surgery patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the studies' quality and out of 2920 studies identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria for inclusion in this review. Dysphagia incidence ranged from 2.7% to 60%, with higher rates observed when objective assessments such as FEES or VFSS were employed. Key risk factors included advanced age, prolonged intubation, cerebrovascular events, and complex operative procedures. Post-operative dysphagia was linked to complications like aspiration pneumonia, prolonged ICU/hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. In conclusion, dysphagia is a significant but under-recognized complication of cardiac surgery. Advanced age, prolonged intubation, and surgical complexity are major risk factors. Standardized assessment protocols and early interventions are crucial to mitigating its impact and improving patient clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.