ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Current Trends in Facelift and Necklift Procedures.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservation facelift: The mesoface.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- The Okumus Incision: A Hairline-Preserving Temporozygomatic Approach for Facelift Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Non-Surgical Ear Rejuvenation Through Selective Neuromodulation with Onabotulinum and Abobotulinum Toxin-A.Toxins · 2026Article
- Retaining Ligaments of the Face: Still Important in Modern Approach in Mid-Face and Neck Lift?Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many surgical and nonsurgical options are available to patients seeking facial rejuvenation. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current trends in facelift and necklift procedures while simultaneously highlighting the utility of nonsurgical treatments. A comprehensive literature review was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, with the objective of including recent literature published on facelift and necklift procedures from 2015 to 2025. Articles were selected based on relevance, with a specific focus on including a wide breadth of techniques. A considerable body of literature has been published to further classify the soft-tissue anatomy of the face and neck. In particular, these studies focus on the characterization of the three-dimensional anatomy of the facial nerve with emphasis on safe planes of dissection to avoid inadvertent facial nerve injury. The current literature continues to debate both the theoretical and practical advantages and disadvantages of various facelift techniques. Broadly speaking, facelift techniques can be divided into those that manipulate the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) layer on its superficial surface and those that undermine the SMAS to varying extents. Numerous approaches are available to improve the contour of the neck and jawline, including manipulation of the platysma muscle and subplatysmal volume reduction. Other surgical procedures and nonsurgical treatments should be considered to optimize and enhance facelift and necklift results. Advancements in patient safety include a focus on minimizing complications while reducing the length of recovery. Facelift and necklift procedures remain the foundational pillars for facial rejuvenation. With attention to patient-specific anatomy, surgeons can work collaboratively with patients to provide global facial optimization by choosing appropriate facelift and necklift techniques in combination with other ancillary procedures. Doing so will deliver enduring, elegant results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.