ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Clinical Management of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toll like receptor 4 (TLR4) in neuroinflammation: From acute hemorrhagic stroke to chronic neurodegeneration.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- CSF Biomarker Profile of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Diagnostic Performance and Imaging Correlates in a Hospital-Based Neurology Cohort.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Imaging and fluid biomarkers for prognostic stratification in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy 30 years after childhood cadaveric dura mater transplantation: a case report.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Determinants of cerebral amyloid angiopathy progression: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.