Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40565954›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Optimizing TLIF Approach Selection: An Algorithmic Framework with Illustrative Cases.

Alyssa M Bartlett, Summer Shabana, Caroline C Folz, Mounica Paturu, Christoper I Shaffrey, Parastou Quist, Olumide Danisa, Khoi D Than, Peter Passias, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alyssa M BartlettDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-6767
Summer ShabanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8177-4831
Caroline C FolzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Mounica PaturuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Christoper I ShaffreyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Parastou QuistDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Olumide DanisaDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0173-7525
Khoi D ThanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Peter PassiasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-4070
Muhammad M Abd-El-BarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7151-2861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly employed surgical technique for managing lumbar degenerative disease and spinal instability. While it offers advantages over posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), traditional TLIF often involves prolonged recovery and morbidity due to muscle retraction. To improve outcomes, several alternative techniques have emerged, including minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), trans-Kambin percutaneous TLIF (PE-TLIF), and transfacet TLIF (TF-TLIF). Each approach presents distinct anatomical and technical advantages, yet no standardized framework exists to guide their selection based on individual patient anatomy. In this study, we review the evolution of TLIF techniques and propose a novel algorithm that integrates patient-specific imaging, anatomical variability, and segmentation data to guide surgical decision-making. By analyzing the surgical corridors, indications, and limitations of each approach, and presenting representative clinical cases, we demonstrate how this algorithm can be applied in practice. For instance, TF-TLIF may be optimal in patients requiring direct decompression without major deformity, while PE-TLIF may be appropriate for those with Kambin's triangles measuring ≥ 9 mm, allowing for indirect decompression. This tailored framework aims to optimize outcomes and reduce complications. Further prospective validation and incorporation of AI-driven segmentation tools are needed to support broader clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Kambin’s trianglespine segmentationsurgical decision-makingtransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID40565954
PMCPMC12194026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.