ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: Evidence and Outcomes-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulmonary metastasectomy and survival in osteosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgery-related prognostic factors.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Association of Maintenance Therapy Strategies with Survival Following First-Line Bevacizumab-Based Combination Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Cryoablation Under Local Anesthesia for Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes From a Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- An unusual case of pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma. The diagnostic work-up to arrive at a final diagnosis.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer represents a key component in modern oncological surgery, balancing precision resection with systemic disease management. Despite ongoing debate initiated by randomized trials, the surgical removal of lung metastases continues to offer significant survival benefits in well-selected patients. This review synthesizes the evolving landscape of pulmonary metastasectomy, integrating classical prognostic indicators, such as the disease-free interval (DFI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, with emerging molecular insights including KRAS and BRAF mutations. The relationship between surgical radicality, systemic therapies, and personalized genetic profiling is redefining patient selection and optimizing outcomes. By dissecting recent evidence and ongoing controversies, we clarify the complex decision-making required to navigate this complex clinical terrain. Ultimately, the synergy of multidisciplinary care and precision surgery holds the promise of durable disease control and extended survival in colorectal cancer patients with lung metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.