Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40565618›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Technological Development in Wholegrain Food Processing.

Francesca Nocente, Laura Gazza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesca NocenteCREA Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Via Manziana 30, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7982-1009
Laura GazzaCREA Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Via Manziana 30, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2772-3199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to give evidence of the current developments and potential applications of emerging technological methods to improve the technological performance and the sensorial acceptability of wholegrain products. The review explores the technologies based on physical, i.e., micronization, steam explosion, high hydrostatic pressure, extrusion cooking, ohmic heating, and 3D printing, and biotechnological methods, such as fermentation and enzymatic treatments in the pre-milling, milling, and transformation steps of wholegrain products. The literature from the past decade for this review article was collected from electronic databases such as ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science.

Indexed as

3D printingcerealsextrusion cookingfermentationhigh hydrostatic pressuremicronizationohmic heatingsourdoughsteam explosionwhole grain

Identifiers

PMID40565618
PMCPMC12191988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.