Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40565592›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Validating Single-Step Genomic Predictions for Growth Rate and Disease Resistance in

Milena Gonzalez, Ignacio Aguilar, Matias Bermann, Marianella Quezada, Jorge Hidalgo, Ignacy Misztal, Daniela Lourenco, Gustavo Balmelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milena GonzalezInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Tacuarembó 45000, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-0863-9437
Ignacio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Montevideo 11500, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-4752
Matias BermannDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Marianella QuezadaDepartamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-7980
Jorge HidalgoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-381X
Ignacy MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Gustavo BalmelliInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Tacuarembó 45000, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-4207

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_FMV_2021_1_1010838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) has gained increasing interest from forest tree breeders. ssGBLUP combines phenotypic and pedigree data with marker data to enhance the prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values. However, potential errors in determining progeny relationships among open-pollinated species may result in lower accuracy of estimated breeding values. Unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF) were developed to address missing pedigrees in a population. This study aimed to incorporate MF into ssGBLUP models to select the best parents for controlled mating and the best progenies for cloning in a tree breeding population of

methodsGenetic groups were defined to include base individuals of similar genetic origin. Tree growth was measured as total height (TH) and diameter at breast height (DBH), while disease resistance was assessed through heteroblasty (the transition from juvenile to adult foliage: ADFO). All traits were evaluated at 14 and 21 months. Two genomic multi-trait threshold linear models were fitted, with and without MF. Also, two multi-trait threshold-linear models based on phenotypic and pedigree information (ABLUP) were used to evaluate the increase in accuracy when adding genomic information to the model. To test the quality of models by cross-validation, the linear regression method (LR) was used.

resultsThe LR statistics indicated that the ssGBLUP models without MF performed better, as the inclusion of MF increased the bias of predictions. The ssGBLUP accuracy for both validations ranged from 0.42 to 0.68.

conclusionsThe best model to select parents for controlled matings and individuals for cloning is ssGBLUP without MF.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceEucalyptusGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociTreesEucalyptusgenomic selectionlinear regression methodmetafoundersssGBLUPtree breeding

Identifiers

PMID40565592
PMCPMC12193199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.