ArticleGenes2025
Validating Single-Step Genomic Predictions for Growth Rate and Disease Resistance in
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic selection validated across two generations of loblolly pine breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) has gained increasing interest from forest tree breeders. ssGBLUP combines phenotypic and pedigree data with marker data to enhance the prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values. However, potential errors in determining progeny relationships among open-pollinated species may result in lower accuracy of estimated breeding values. Unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF) were developed to address missing pedigrees in a population. This study aimed to incorporate MF into ssGBLUP models to select the best parents for controlled mating and the best progenies for cloning in a tree breeding population of
methodsGenetic groups were defined to include base individuals of similar genetic origin. Tree growth was measured as total height (TH) and diameter at breast height (DBH), while disease resistance was assessed through heteroblasty (the transition from juvenile to adult foliage: ADFO). All traits were evaluated at 14 and 21 months. Two genomic multi-trait threshold linear models were fitted, with and without MF. Also, two multi-trait threshold-linear models based on phenotypic and pedigree information (ABLUP) were used to evaluate the increase in accuracy when adding genomic information to the model. To test the quality of models by cross-validation, the linear regression method (LR) was used.
resultsThe LR statistics indicated that the ssGBLUP models without MF performed better, as the inclusion of MF increased the bias of predictions. The ssGBLUP accuracy for both validations ranged from 0.42 to 0.68.
conclusionsThe best model to select parents for controlled matings and individuals for cloning is ssGBLUP without MF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.