ArticleGenes2025
ChromoCheck: Predicting Postnatal Chromosomal Trisomy Cases Using a Support Vector Machine Learning Model.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- PrimerAST: A predictive machine learning tool for primer design and quality assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChromosomal study via karyotype is one of the historical gold-standard procedures used to provide a clearer view of chromosomal trisomy abnormalities. It has been used to correlate several phenotypic manifestations that require immediate medical intervention. However, the laboratory procedure persisted with various drawbacks. The recent machine learning model shed light on prediction capabilities in the medical field. In this study, we aimed to use a support vector machine model for predicting postnatal chromosomal trisomy cases.
methodsA dataset of 946 neonatal records from the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman, covering the period from 2013 to 2023, has been used in this model. The model is based on features such as thyroxine hormone levels and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. With different R packages, we used a support vector machine model with leave-one-out cross-validation and ten iterations to test three kernel functions: linear, radial, and polynomial.
resultsAmong the obtained kernel performances, the linear kernel has optimal classification performance. The training accuracy was 81%, and the testing accuracy was 82%. Sensitivity ranged from 97 to 98%, and specificity ranged from 79 to 80%. The area under the curve in relation to the training dataset came to 0.89, and it came to 0.90 for the test dataset. We deployed the trained models in a website tool called ChromoCheck.
conclusionsOur study is an example of how machine learning can be instrumental in augmenting conventional methods of cytogenetics diagnosis and decision-making in a clinical setup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.